The Way of the Gun

A reminder of guns in the big picture of history and common sense.

Sooner or later- probably sooner -- Americans will be left with two choices: freedom or a safety at the mercy of bureaucrats who will have a monopoly on force. I know this seems melodramatic and even paranoid, but I am not saying that banning assault rifles will result to complete loss of freedom. I am saying it will never be enough. Enough will be when the word “gun” becomes illegal. Then they'll find something else to ban...because people will still hurt one another.

Things have changed. For whatever reason(s), people are going crazy. As much as we would like, things will never be the same again. They never are.

Safety First

For people who think safety can be achieved without changing human behavior and aren’t particularly aware (or are incredibly naïve) of the atrocities committed by governments who’ve had a monopoly on force, gun bans and/or more control seem like good ideas. To a certain degree, I suppose I agree. The president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence stated on CNN that forty percent of gun buyers do so without a having their background checked (I must say, I am highly suspicious of this claim, seeing as how every time I’ve purchased a firearm, I had to wait while the dealer called the FBI to make sure I am not a lunatic, and I’ve never heard any different from other gun owners). So check our background. I won’t argue with that. I don’t want lunatics in possession of firepower either. And if you can efficiently and systematically give people some form of a psychiatric evaluation, I’m not sure I disagree with that either. But I can’t help but believe such measures will somehow be misconducted or be completely useless, seeing as how it is nearly impossible- unless the individual is growling and trying to bite your face off during the evaluation- to determine if someone is actually crazy.

Another point anti-gunners have is the power street weapons have these days (it’s too much). Large-capacity clips were obviously not the case when the Bill OF Rights was being put together. But do we have so little faith in ourselves and so much in other human beings that we think they are far more capable of handling so much more power than us? (I know for many the answer is a resounding “Yes!”) Let’s be serious. Anybody remember Abu Ghraib? You know… where soldiers peed on detainees. Ya. That’s who would have significantly more firepower than us. Detainee-peeing soldiers. Or what about the numerous scandals which have brought to light thousands of corrupt police officers? (See Operation Tow Scam, Rampart Scandal, The Kathryn Johnson shooting, and many others for just a taste. In fact, I’m sure by the time you read this, there will be a fresh batch of scandals all ready to outrage you.)

Okay. I change my mind. Any way you slice it, gun bans are a terrible idea. Gun bans seems like an ideal concept… if we lived in an ideal world. But we don’t. Just because someone lays his weapons down and pretends to live in a world where if we go first, the lunatic will follow, does not mean Lunatic will follow.  He does not play by the same rules we do. The world is a mean place. It’s true. I promise you. And since it is a mean place, people of all walks of life and degrees of power will want to hurt you. It has always been the case and will always continue to be so.

Since we don’t live in a fluffy world where pretty ideas work because things always go exactly as we want it to, yet we’ve determined that things can’t be the same anymore, What are we to do?

If we want to live in a world where we will be free to express our wacky views and worship whatever or whomever it is we want without the fear or threat of a entity more powerful than us, we will have to give up the freedom to not carry… as in, a firearm. I know this seems preposterous to a generation who has been told over and over that guns have a mind of their own, and it is a wicked little mind who pulls its own trigger and people should be highly intimidated by Mr. Mean Gun because he will turn himself around and blow your face away if you piss him off. But I assure you, it’s a great idea. Ask the Swiss and the Israelis (those people are born with a firearm in their hands). They have shooting tournaments at carnivals. Did I mention they have ridiculously low crime rates?

A teacher and the principle of Sandy Hook both lunged at the Newtown lunatic in attempts to stop him. Who’s to say that, had either one of those staff members been carrying, the killing wouldn’t have been greatly reduced, if not completely deterred?

We must accept that we have created a world where the fear of God Almighty no longer exists because we (media and education systems) have told people that is the case; God doesn’t exist. So, if potential crazies don’t fear their Maker, they must fear something else. It’s obviously not going to be the authorities.

So, it’s going to have to be me and you.

I want the fear of my .380 to constantly stab at the mind of every potential whack job who wants to senselessly harm anyone. I want the fear of my sister’s teacher’s .45 to be a constant nag in the mind of any poor soul whose thought has a though considering hurting innocent people. I want the fear of your magnum or .38 Special to lie in the frontal lobe of every thug walking the street and looking for easy prey; I want scum to know there is no easy prey. We are sick and tired of being portrayed as weak.

And if they don’t develop that fear, that’s fine because my bullets aren’t prejudiced.

Lastly, I want the fear of all 300 million plus American-owned firearms to be on the mind of any potential group of tyrants who don’t think a person’s freedom is more important than blind, unquestionable submission to the State. I love America and I think the many great things the U.S. has done for human rights and humanitarian causes all over the world is nothing less than amazing. But the reality is that Government is not a single-minded entity. It can, as it has in the past, be taken over and turned on its own people. And unlike the hundreds who have been mercilessly killed by random acts of horrific violence, when Mr. State gets to getting off rounds, the damage ends up in the MILLIONS.

Yes. Something has to be done. But if you think disarming law-abiding citizens and leaving all the fire power to our pee-happy government employees and thugs is the answer, then I will leave you with a few reminders of damage done by complete power.

Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public.

50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)
12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs
8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)
6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)
5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)
2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)
1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)
1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)
1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)
1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)
900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)
800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Paul L. Dragu December 22, 2012 at 05:31 PM
What does it matter WHEN Hitler touched the gun laws? (Ironically Obama is coming up on 4 years of power) Bottom line is he unarmed the people he massacred; or is the Holocaust NRA propaganda as well? You said "the only change" as if it is some minor footnote of history that Hitler made one little bitty change which happened to kill a minuscule 13 MILLION Jews.You might want to check your history instead of jumping to a conclusion based on the fact that the 3 people who lived on the equivalent of Alaska (Siberia). had guns. In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million people were rounded up and exterminated. Just because you use demeaning words such as "propaganda" and "regurgitated" does not change facts and it sure does not negate reason. Good points with facts are regurgitated precisely because they are facts, and facets of reason.
George Wilson December 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM
Lets play follow the money and responsibility for the massacre at Sandy Hook. The military-style assault weapon used to kill most of the victims in last week's Sandy Hook elementary school massacre in Connecticut was a Bushmaster XM-15 .223 caliber rifle, manufactured by Bushmaster Firearms International LLC, which is owned by the Freedom Group of Madison, N.C. Cerberus Capital Management is a the private equity firm that owns the Freedom Group -based in New York City, Cerberus is owned by billionaire financier Stephen A. Feinberg. Freedom Group is the world's largest manufacturer of commercial firearms, ammunition and accessories, owning brands that in addition to Bushmaster include Remington, DPMS/Panther Arms, Marlin, H&R, The Parker Gun, Advanced Armament Corp., Dakota Arms, Para USA, Barnes Bullets and TAPCO. Despite the sluggish economy, the Freedom Group has been doing well, with sales up 20 percent in the third quarter of this year compared to the same period last year, according to its third-quarter financial report. Sales made to Arkansas-based Wal-Mart accounts for a substantial portion of the company's total sales at about 13 percent. George Kollitides, the chair and interim CEO of the Freedom Group, is a major Republican donor. A former managing director for Cerberus, he contributed $10,000 to the Republican National Committee in October and $2,500 to Mitt Romney's presidential campaign in May.
Paul L. Dragu December 22, 2012 at 11:28 PM
You can't be serious. I'm not sure such inverted logic even merits a response. I'll play this game. Adam Lanza lived in Connecticut, where Mrs. Butterworth got her start. That means that all Connecticut residents pay no taxes on Mrs. Butterworth goods, making it more probable that Adam had Mrs. Butterworth pancakes the morning of. Now, neurological studies have shown that certain synthetic ingredients in Mrs. Butterworth's flour have hints of toxins capable of redirecting brain pathways. Adam had those dangerous pancakes, went postal, and did the unthinkable. Clearly this is MRrs. Butterworth's fault because they make tons of money and contributed to Reagan's campaign. Or we can blame the car maker the killer drove,or the tires on the car for not blowing before he got to the school. Or how about we blame the door maker of the door the killer shot to get into the school? Those door companies make tons of money because everyone buys doors. And I bet they contribute to parties other than democrat as well.
Richard T. December 25, 2012 at 12:06 AM
I must have well-behaved guns, including my Bushmaster M-4. I've owned may of them for a large part of my 60 years, and they've never tried to hurt anyone or anything. Once a gun has been proven to misbehave, it should be confiscated by the Imperial Federal Government and destroyed. Additionally the owner of any gun which misbehaves should be generously compensated by the evil gun manufacturer.
Chris Bailey January 05, 2013 at 01:04 PM
George Wilson, you need to check your facts. An AR style rifle was NOT used to murder the children at Sandy Hook, the criminal used only handguns. In the medias rush to vilify guns as being bad they screwed the pooch again. Liberal fools; blinded by their idealism. Where are the pragmatic people?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »